Re: missing madvise functionality

From: Rik van Riel
Date: Thu Apr 05 2007 - 11:47:55 EST


Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 03:39:29 -0400 Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Rik van Riel wrote:

MADV_DONTNEED, unpatched, 1000 loops

real 0m13.672s
user 0m1.217s
sys 0m45.712s


MADV_DONTNEED, with patch, 1000 loops

real 0m4.169s
user 0m2.033s
sys 0m3.224s
I just noticed something fun with these numbers.

Without the patch, the system (a quad core CPU) is 10% idle.

With the patch, it is 66% idle - presumably I need Nick's
mmap_sem patch.

However, despite being 66% idle, the test still runs over
3 times as fast!

Please quote the context switch rate when testing this stuff (I use vmstat 1).
I've seen it vary by a factor of 10,000 depending upon what's happening.

About context switches 14000 per second.

I'll go compile in Nick's patch to see if that makes
things go faster. I expect it will.

procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- -----cpu------
r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa st
1 0 0 965232 250024 370848 0 0 0 0 1026 13914 13 21 67 0 0
1 0 0 965232 250024 370848 0 0 0 0 1018 14654 12 20 68 0 0
1 0 0 965232 250024 370848 0 0 0 0 1023 14006 12 21 67 0 0


--
Politics is the struggle between those who want to make their country
the best in the world, and those who believe it already is. Each group
calls the other unpatriotic.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/