Re: [test] sched: SD-latest versus Mike's latest

[Mike Galbraith]

On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 13:54 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> here's some test results, comparing SD-latest to Mike's-latest:
> 
> re-testing the weak points of the vanilla scheduler + Mike's:
> 
>  - thud.c:    this workload has almost unnoticeable effect
>  - fiftyp.c:  noticeable, but alot better than previously!

Hmm.  Here fiftyp.c is utterly harmless.  If you have a second, can you
send me a top snapshot?  If you're running many of them, it can take a
bit for the throttle to catch them all.

	-Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/