Re: plain 2.6.21-rc5 (1) vs amanda (0)

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Wed Apr 04 2007 - 04:46:13 EST



* Dave Dillow <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Then it is a matter of figuring out why the device number changed --
> > I'm thinking it is device-mapper, but will look closer tomorrow.
>
> This commit is the one that changed it:
>
> commit fdf892be32d84a1745fa0aee5fc60517421b8038
> Author: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon Feb 12 00:51:44 2007 -0800
>
> [PATCH] register_blkdev(): don't hand out the LOCAL/EXPERIMENTAL majors
>
> As pointed out in http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7922,
> dynamic blockdev major allocation can hand out majors which LANANA
> has defined as being for local/experimental use.

i dont think we should break backwards compatibility with a system that
has not changed any hardware. Andrew, should we revert this?

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/