Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix MTRR suspend support for specific machines (some AMD64, maybe others also)

[Dave Jones]

On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 03:55:32PM +0200, Bernhard Kaindl wrote:

 > PS: I attached a program which uses msr.ko (CONFIG_X86_MSR) from
 >  Processor type and features
 >      -> [M/*] /dev/cpu/*/msr - Model-specific register support
 > to dump the contents of the fixed-range MTTRs to stdout.
 > 
 > On a two-CPU system, the output format looks like this:
 > 
 > MSR 0x250: 1e1e1e1e1e1e1e1e | 0606060606060606 |
 > MSR 0x258: 1e1e1e1e1e1e1e1e | 0606060606060606 |
 > MSR 0x259: 0000000000000000 | 0000000000000000 |
 > MSR 0x268: 1515151515151515 | 0505050505050505 |
 > MSR 0x269: 1515151515151515 | 0505050505050505 |
 > MSR 0x26a: 0000000000000000 | 0000000000000000 |
 > MSR 0x26b: 0000000000000000 | 0000000000000000 |
 > MSR 0x26c: 1515151500000000 | 0505050500000000 |
 > MSR 0x26d: 1515151515151515 | 0505050505050505 |
 > MSR 0x26e: 1515151515151515 | 0505050505050505 |
 > MSR 0x26f: 1515151515151515 | 0505050505050505 |

FWIW, x86info --mtrr would have done this for you :)

 > To have a sane MTRR setup the MTRRs of the CPUs should always
 > match, but this has so far not lead to problems, it seems. However,
 > Intel and AMD manuals tell us to keep MTRRs in sync for good reasons.

Indeed.  From a quick lookover, I don't see anything obviously
wrong in your patches, though Jan and Andi probably remember more
gory details about that code than I'll admit to.

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/