Re: missing madvise functionality

[Andi Kleen]

On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 10:20:02AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Why do you need a lock for that? I don't see any problem with
> > two threads doing that in parallel. The kernel would
> > serialize it internally and one would fail, but that shouldn't
> > be a problem. 
> 
> There is no lock at all at userlevel.  I'm talking about locks in the
> kernel.

mmap_sem? Your new operation wouldn't solve that neither.

There were some proposals to fix mmap_sem (it's a big issue
for futexes too) but they're are quite involved.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/