Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 7/7] containers (V7): Container interface to nsproxy subsystem

[Srivatsa Vaddagiri]

On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 09:52:35AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> I'm not saying "let's use nsproxy" - I'm not yet convinced that the
> lifetime/mutation/correlation rate of a pointer in an nsproxy is
> likely to be the same as for a container subsystem; if not, then
> reusing nsproxy could actually increase space overheads (since you'd
> end up with more, larger nsproxy objects, compared to smaller numbers
> of smaller nsproxy objects and smaller numbers of smaller
> container_group objects), even though it saved (just) one pointer per
> task_struct.

Even if nsproxy objects are made larger a bit, the number of such object will
be -much- lesser compared to number of task_structs I would think, so
the win/lose in space savings would need to take that into account.


-- 
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/