Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 7/7] containers (V7): Container interface to nsproxy subsystem

[Paul Menage]

On 4/3/07, Serge E. Hallyn <serue@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> But frankly I don't know where we stand right now wrt the containers
> patches.  Do most people want to go with Vatsa's latest version moving
> containers into nsproxy?  Has any other development been going on?
> Paul, have you made any updates?

I've not made major changes since the last patch post, just some small
optimizations and fixes - I've been too tied up with other stuff.

Whilst I've got no objection in general to using nsproxy rather than
the container_group object that I introduced in my latest patches, I
think that Vatsa's approach of losing the general container object is
flawed, since it loses any kind of per-group generic state (e.g. "this
container is being deleted") and last time I saw it, I think it would
tend to lose processes so that they didn't show up in any directory in
the container fs.

Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/