Re: [PATCH] sched: staircase deadline misc fixes

[Ingo Molnar]

* Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx> wrote:

> > Try two instances of chew.c at _differing_ nice levels on one cpu on 
> > mainline, and then SD. This is why you can't renice X on mainline.
> 
> How about something more challenging instead :)
> 
> The numbers below are from my scheduler tree with massive_intr running 
> at nice 0, and chew at nice 5.  Below these numbers are 100 lines from 
> the exact center of chew's output.
> 
> (interactivity remains intact with this rather heavy load)

looks interesting - could you send the patch?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/