Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 7/7] containers (V7): Container interface to nsproxy subsystem

[Srivatsa Vaddagiri]

On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 09:09:39AM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Losing the directory isn't a big deal though.  And both unsharing a
> namespace (which causes a ns_container_clone) and mounting the hierarchy
> are done by userspace, so if for some installation it is a big deal,
> the init scripts on initrd can mount the hierarchy before doing any
> unsharing.

Yes I thought of that after posting this (that initrd can mount the
hierarchies), so this should not be an issue in practice ..

> Can you think of a reason why losing a few directories matters?

If we loose directories, then we don't have a way to manage the
task-group it represents thr' the filesystem interface, so I consider
that bad. As we agree, this will not be an issue if initrd
mounts the ns hierarchy atleast at bootup.

-- 
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/