On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 07:20:57AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Heiko Carstens wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 03:53:12PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:I don't have any present plans for that. Maybe when the interface starts
This patchset updates the kvm userspace interface to what I hope will[...]
be the long-term stable interface. Provisions are included for extending
the interface later. The patches address performance and cleanliness
concerns.
But the general question is: do you still plan to switch to a syscall
interface?
to evolve at a slower pace, or if it is shown to be significantly faster.
Not that interface stabilization here doesn't mean a freeze; it means that
backwards compatibility starts when this gets merged.
If the interface is considered to be stable you can get rid of the
KVM_GET_API_VERSION ioctl, since the version can't change anymore, right?