Re: [-mm patch] fix the ROMFS_* dependencies

[Adrian Bunk]

On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:36:55PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > OK, what about the patch below?
> 
> How many goats did you have to sacrifice to get that to work?

I'd say it was quite straightforward.  :-)

> I like it with
> just one very minor niggle: if CONFIG_BLOCK=y, CONFIG_MTD=y, CONFIG_ROMFS_FS=y
> CONFIG_EMBEDDED=y and CONFIG_ROMFS_ON_BLOCK=y then the CONFIG_ROMFS_ON_BLOCK
> configuration item disappears and reappears depending on the state of
> CONFIG_ROMFS_ON_MTD.  But, as I said, it's a very minor niggle.
>...

I've also seen this, but I didn't find any way to solve this, and 
cosmetical issues only visible with CONFIG_EMBEDDED=y are nothing I'm 
that much worried about.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/