Re: [PATCH] [RSDL 5/6] sched: implement rsdl cpu scheduler

From: Gene Heskett
Date: Mon Mar 05 2007 - 16:06:19 EST


On Monday 05 March 2007, Matt Mackall wrote:
>On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 06:06:22PM +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
>> + * This is the time all tasks within the same priority round robin.
>> + * Set to a minimum of 6ms.
>> */
>> +#define RR_INTERVAL ((6 * HZ / 1001) + 1)
>
>What happens with small HZ? Like 100? I suppose 10ms is a reasonable
>number here. But in general, how well does this scheduler do without a
>time source other than jiffies?

I don't personally know, but another poster I recall did say he was using
a slow clock and it worked great so you might backtrack in this thread.
I'm using the 1k clock here.

--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/