Re: [PATCH,RESEND 2/3] cpufreq_ondemand.c: don't use _WORK_NAR

From: Dave Jones
Date: Fri Feb 23 2007 - 16:49:20 EST

On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 12:35:06AM +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Looks like dbs_timer() is very careful wrt per_cpu(cpu_dbs_info),
> and it doesn't need the help of WORK_STRUCT_NOAUTOREL.
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-By: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>

This is sitting in cpufreq.git already.
I'll ask Linus to pull when he gets back.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at