Re: [RFT] bridge: eliminate port_check workqueue
From: Jarek Poplawski
Date: Thu Feb 22 2007 - 03:43:04 EST
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 10:55:55AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> This is what I was suggesting by getting rid of the work queue completely.
> --- bridge.orig/net/bridge/br_if.c 2007-02-21 10:22:46.000000000 -0800
> +++ bridge/net/bridge/br_if.c 2007-02-21 10:53:25.000000000 -0800
> @@ -77,26 +77,15 @@
> * Called from work queue to allow for calling functions that
> * might sleep (such as speed check), and to debounce.
What about this comment?
> -static void port_carrier_check(struct work_struct *work)
> +void br_port_carrier_check(struct net_bridge_port *p)
Of course my opinion shouldn't matter here, but it looks
like withdrawing (or giving up) to the older way. So I'm
not excited, but I trust there is a reason for this.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/