Re: [RFC PATCH(Experimental) 2/4] Revert changes to workqueue.c
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri
Date: Wed Feb 21 2007 - 10:54:16 EST
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 05:30:10PM +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Agreed. Note that we don't need the new "del_work". It is always safe to
> use cancel_work_sync() if we know that the workqueue is frozen, it won't
> block. We can also do
> if (!cancel_delayed_work())
> but it is ok to do cancel_work_sync() unconditionally.
Argh ..I should keep referring to recent sources. I didnt see
cancel_work_sync() in my sources (2.6.20-rc4) and hence invented that
del_work()! Anyway thanx for pointing out.
This change will probably let us do CPU_DOWN_PREPARE after
freeze_processes(). However I will keep my fingers crossed on whether it
is really a good idea to send CPU_DOWN/UP_PREPARE after
freeze_processes() until we get more review/testing results.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/