Re: [PATCH 2.6.21-rc1] serial: serial_txx9 driver update
Date: Wed Feb 21 2007 - 10:47:15 EST
> +static void serial_txx9_initialize(struct uart_port *port)
> + struct uart_txx9_port *up = (struct uart_txx9_port *)port;
> + sio_out(up, TXX9_SIFCR, TXX9_SIFCR_SWRST);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_TX49XX
> + /* TX4925 BUG WORKAROUND. Accessing SIOC register
> + * immediately after soft reset causes bus error. */
> + iob();
> + udelay(1);
Given this costs 1uS in a path that is not performance critical is it
worth putting the #ifdef/#endif in instead of having one set of code that
works for all ?
> + while (sio_in(up, TXX9_SIFCR) & TXX9_SIFCR_SWRST)
> + ;
Suppose it doesn't clear ? Should also use cpu_relax() in busy loops
so any processor variant with power management can do the right thing.
Neither of course are bugs you have added, just things you have moved that
seem worth asking about.
Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxx>
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/