Re: memparse(), simple_strtoul() prototypes...
From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Sun Feb 18 2007 - 19:31:16 EST
Francis Moreau wrote:
I must miss something...
Looking at these prototypes
unsigned long simple_strtoul(const char *cp, char **endp,unsigned int base)
unsigned long long memparse (char *ptr, char **retptr)
I'm really wondering why not all parameters are not all 'const'. None
of these functions modify any pointer containts. And simple_strtoul()
ends up doing sometghing like:
*endp = (char *)cp;
Could anyone shed some light ?
The C standard behaves like that, too, mostly because C doesn't have a
way to say "X is const iff Y is const" (unlike C++, btw.)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/