Re: [mmc] incorrect behavior on resume
From: Alex Dubov
Date: Sun Feb 18 2007 - 07:18:38 EST
> I don't see that - as I say above, the correct sequence is:
> - host device resume
> - calls mmc_resume_host()
> - child's device resume (mmc_blk_resume)
> - mmc_queue_resume()
Of course, I understand that this is a correct sequence. It simply was not obvious to me that host
will issue requests even if mmc_resume_host is not called.
I'm trying to implement a hotplugable host, so I assumed that if host was removed during the
suspended state there's no need to resume it.
Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate
in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/