Re: [ck] Re: 2.6.20-ck1

[Chuck Ebbert]

Con Kolivas wrote:
> Maintainers are far too busy off testing code for 
> 16+ cpus, petabytes of disk storage and so on to try it for themselves.  Plus 
> they worry incessantly that my patches may harm those precious machines' 
> performance... 
> 

But the one I like, mm-filesize_dependant_lru_cache_add.patch,
has an on-off switch.

In other words it adds an option to do things differently.
How could that possibly affect any workload if that option
isn't enabled?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/