Re: [patch 00/21] Xen-paravirt: Xen guest implementation forparavirt_ops interface

From: Christoph Lameter
Date: Fri Feb 16 2007 - 16:14:01 EST

On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Zachary Amsden wrote:

> For the most part, it doesn't disturb VMware or KVM. Xen does need some
> additional functionality in paravirt-ops because they took a different design
> choice - direct page tables instead of shadow page tables. This is where all
> the requirements for the new Xen paravirt-ops hooks come from.

It still seems to be implemented for Xen and not to support a variety of
page table methods in paravirt ops.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at