Re: [patch 04/21] Xen-paravirt: ===================================================================

From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Date: Fri Feb 16 2007 - 12:33:02 EST

Andi Kleen wrote:
> Subject? description?
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 06:24:53PM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> -static void vmi_set_pte_present(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte)
>> +static void vmi_set_pte_present(struct mm_struct *mm, u32 addr, pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte)
> And what good is that change anyways? unsigned long is the usual style
> for addresses.
There was a fair amount of inconsistency. In this case, u32 was being
used for existing functions dealing with addresses, and I propagated it
through. I can switch it all back to unsigned long if you'd prefer.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at