Re: [RFC] killing the NR_IRQS arrays.

[Ingo Molnar]

* Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> So I propose we remove all assumptions from the code that we actually 
> have an array of irqs.  That will allow for irq_desc to be dynamically 
> allocated instead of statically allocated saving memory and reducing 
> kernel complexity.

hm. I'd suggest to do this without changing request_irq() - and then we 
could avoid the 'massive, every driver affected' change, right?

i.e. because we'll (have to) have an nr_to_desc() and desc_to_nr() 
mapping facility anyway, lets just not change the driver APIs massively. 
There dont seem to be that many drivers that assume that irq_desc[] is 
an array - are there?

otherwise, in terms of the irqchips infrastructure and the API between 
genirq and the irqchip arch-level drivers, this change makes quite a bit 
of sense i think.

or am i missing something fundamental?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/