Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: mark framebuffer as Orphan
From: Adrian Bunk
Date: Fri Feb 16 2007 - 07:24:15 EST
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 03:05:26PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:26:10 +0000 (GMT) James Simmons wrote:
> > I wouldn't say it orphan. I just can't spend 8 hours a day on it.
> > Alot of patches have been flowing into the layer.
> So would you like to leave it as Maintained or change it to
> "Odd Fixes"? (Maintained => a maintainer) From the MAINTAINTERS file:
> Supported: Someone is actually paid to look after this.
> Maintained: Someone actually looks after it.
> Odd Fixes: It has a maintainer but they don't have time to do
> much other than throw the odd patch in. See below..
> Orphan: No current maintainer [but maybe you could take the
> role as you write your new code].
> Obsolete: Old code. Something tagged obsolete generally means
> it has been replaced by a better system and you
> should be using that.
If you start doing this, there are a lot more entries that need to be
Which of Supported/Maintained/"Odd Fixes" is written doesn't matter in
What matters is that James' email address gets into the entry so that
patches and bug reports reach him.
James' work is definitely no below the average of entries marked as
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/