RE: [PATCH 3/6] scsi: megaraid_sas - throttle io if FW is busy

From: Patro, Sumant
Date: Thu Feb 15 2007 - 18:44:56 EST


Yes I can make it boolean.
Will change it in a future patch submission.

Thanks,
Sumant

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Knutsson [mailto:ricknu-0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 12:10 AM
To: Patro, Sumant
Cc: James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxx; akpm@xxxxxxxx;
linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Kolli, Neela;
Yang, Bo; Patro, Sumant
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] scsi: megaraid_sas - throttle io if FW is busy

Sumant Patro wrote:
> Checks added in megasas_queue_command to know if FW is able to process

> commands within the timeout period. If number of retries is 2 or more,

> the driver stops sending cmd to FW. IO is resumed when pending cmd
> count reduces to 16 or 10 seconds has elapsed from the time cmds were
> last sent to FW.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sumant Patro <sumant.patro@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h | 3 ++
> 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
>
>
[snip]
> diff -uprN linux-feb13-new-p2/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h
linux-feb13-new-p3/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h
> --- linux-feb13-new-p2/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h
2007-02-13 07:22:40.000000000 -0800
> +++ linux-feb13-new-p3/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h
2007-02-13 11:37:09.000000000 -0800
> @@ -1102,6 +1102,9 @@ struct megasas_instance {
> atomic_t fw_outstanding;
> u32 hw_crit_error;
>
> + u8 is_busy;
>
Why not "bool is_busy:8;"? It obviously is a boolean. I would also think
false/true would be more descriptive then 0/1.

Richard Knutsson

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/