Re: [PATCH 6/7] containers (V7): BeanCounters over generic process containers

[Paul Menage]

On 2/13/07, Pavel Emelianov <xemul@xxxxx> wrote:
> I have implementation that moves arbitrary task :)

Is that the one that calls stop_machine() in order to move a task
around? That seemed a little heavyweight ...

> May be we can do context (container-on-task) handling lockless?

What did you have in mind?

> > I thought that we solved that problem by having a tmp_bc field in the
> > task_struct that would take precedence over the main bc if it was
> > non-null?
>
> Of course, but I'm commenting this patchset which doesn't have
> this facility.

OK, I can add the concept in to the example too.

Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/