Re: [RFC] [PATCH] more support for memory-less-node.

[KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki]

On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:29:49 +0100
Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> > In my understanding, a "node" is a block of cpu, memory, devices.
> > and there could be cpu-only-node, memory-only-node, device-only-node...
> 
> The trouble with this is that you'll need to harden large parts
> of code against these.  Especially a NULL pgdat is something quite
> dangerous. You could make it a dummy empty pgdat, but just assigning it
> nearby seems easier.

Ah...It seems I didn't explain enough.

Now, memorly-less-node has its own pgdat, for its own zonelist.
All *online* node has its own NODA_DATA(nid).

NOD_DATA(nid) is always valid pointer if a node is online.
NODE_DATA(nid)->present_pages can be 0 even if a node is online, 
I call this as memory-less-node.

Thanks,
-Kame


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/