Re: [PATCH x86 for review III] [1/29] i386: avoid gcc extension

[Randy Dunlap]

On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:43:36 +0000 Jochen Voß wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On 12/02/07, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > setcc() in math-emu is written as a gcc extension statement expression
> > macro that returns a value.  However, it's not used that way and it's not
> > needed like that, so just make it a do-while non-extension macro so that we
> > don't use an extension when it's not needed.
> 
> This description ...
> 
> ... seems to contradict the implementation.  No "do-while" here.
> 
> I hope this helps,

Yes, thanks.  First version was do-while, latter was inline.

Here's an updated patch/description.

---
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>

setcc() in math-emu is written as a gcc extension statement expression
macro that returns a value.  However, it's not used that way and it's
not needed like that, so just make it an inline void so that
we don't use an extension when it's not needed.

Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/i386/math-emu/status_w.h |    8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- linux-2620-rc2.orig/arch/i386/math-emu/status_w.h
+++ linux-2620-rc2/arch/i386/math-emu/status_w.h
@@ -48,9 +48,11 @@
 
 #define status_word() \
   ((partial_status & ~SW_Top & 0xffff) | ((top << SW_Top_Shift) & SW_Top))
-#define setcc(cc) ({ \
-  partial_status &= ~(SW_C0|SW_C1|SW_C2|SW_C3); \
-  partial_status |= (cc) & (SW_C0|SW_C1|SW_C2|SW_C3); })
+static inline void setcc(int cc)
+{
+	partial_status &= ~(SW_C0|SW_C1|SW_C2|SW_C3);
+	partial_status |= (cc) & (SW_C0|SW_C1|SW_C2|SW_C3);
+}
 
 #ifdef PECULIAR_486
    /* Default, this conveys no information, but an 80486 does it. */
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/