Re: [PATCH] serial driver PMC MSP71xx, kernel linux-mips.git mast er

[Sergei Shtylyov]

Hello.

Marc St-Jean wrote:

> > >> > Fourth attempt at the serial driver patch for the PMC-Sierra MSP71xx
> > >>device.

> >    I think you need to submit your patch to Andrew Morton since it 
> > requires a patch from his tree.

> OK, will do.

   In fact, since the serial drivers are not maintained anymore, this seems 
the only option.

> > >> > +                     /* The DesignWare APB UART has an Busy Detect
> > >>(0x07)
> > >> > +                      * interrupt meaning an LCR write attempt
> > >>occured while the
> > >> > +                      * UART was busy. The interrupt must be cleared
> > >>by reading
> > >> > +                      * the UART status register (USR) and the LCR
> > >>re-written. */
> > >> > +                     unsigned int status;
> > >> > +                     status = *(volatile u32 
> > *)up->port.private_data;
> > >> > +                     serial_out(up, UART_LCR, up->lcr);
> > >> > +
> > >> > +                     handled = 1;
> > >> > +
> > >> > +                     end = NULL;
> > >> >               } else if (end == NULL)
> > >> >                       end = l;

> > >> >       return 0;

> > >>    Still, shouldn't you be doing this in serial8250_timeout()

> > > No, the serial8250_timeout is for issue 1 at the top, this is for
> > > issue 2.

> >    It's for lost interrupts, IIUC. They use anothe timeout handler for the
> > workaround...

> This issue (2) is a completely new type of interrupt generated but the
> DesignWare APB uart, it has nothing to do with lost interrupts.

   Yeah, I just thought that the lost interrupts might be a "generic" issue.

> > >>also?
> > >>What IRQ numbers this UART is using, BTW?

> > > For the ports on the device they are 27 and 42. Is there any 
> > significance
> > > that I'm not aware of?

> >    Yeah, IRQ0 is treated as no IRQ by 8250, and in this case it falls 
> > back to using serial8250_timeout() to handle "interrupts".

> Good to know. It won't be affecting us then.

   This may be overriden anyway...

> > >>    Oops, your mailer went and did it again. :-)

> > > I'm completely giving up on Thunderbird,unless someone can point out

> >    Ypu should have long ago. :-)

> > > the specific internal configuration items which needs a kick!

> >    Only the attachments will work in the Mozilla kind mailer, AFAIK.
> > The last patch looked OK at last. :-)

> The attachemnents appear to be MIME which is a no-no according the

   The text/plain type attachments seem to be acceptable for the most 
maintainers.  This Mozilla can do, at least. :-)

> linux FAQ at kernel.org. I guess I'll stick with /bin/mail.

> Thanks,
> Marc

WBR, Sergei
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/