[PATCH 2.6.20 08/10] nfnetlink_log: shorten instances_lock holding time

From: Michał Mirosław
Date: Mon Feb 12 2007 - 04:11:31 EST


Shorten instances_lock window at the cost of doing unnecessary work
on the failure case. I don't know if it makes sense actually. ;>

Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

--- linux-2.6.20/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_log.c.6 2007-02-11 22:31:19.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.20/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_log.c 2007-02-11 22:41:18.000000000 +0100
@@ -149,18 +149,14 @@ instance_create(u_int16_t group_num, int

if (!try_module_get(THIS_MODULE)) {
UDEBUG("aborting, could not reference own module (module unloading?)\n");
- goto out_modunload;
- }
-
- write_lock_bh(&instances_lock);
- if (__instance_lookup(group_num)) {
- UDEBUG("aborting, instance already exists\n");
- goto out_unlock;
+ return NULL;
}

inst = kzalloc(sizeof(*inst), GFP_ATOMIC);
- if (!inst)
- goto out_unlock;
+ if (!inst) {
+ module_put(THIS_MODULE);
+ return NULL;
+ }

INIT_HLIST_NODE(&inst->hlist);
spin_lock_init(&inst->lock);
@@ -181,21 +177,25 @@ instance_create(u_int16_t group_num, int
inst->copy_mode = NFULNL_COPY_PACKET;
inst->copy_range = 0xffff;

- hlist_add_head(&inst->hlist,
+ write_lock_bh(&instances_lock);
+
+ if (!__instance_lookup(group_num)) {
+ hlist_add_head(&inst->hlist,
&instance_table[instance_hashfn(group_num)]);

- UDEBUG("newly added node: %p, next=%p\n", &inst->hlist,
- inst->hlist.next);
+ UDEBUG("newly added node: %p, next=%p\n", &inst->hlist,
+ inst->hlist.next);
+ } else {
+ UDEBUG("aborting, instance already exists\n");
+
+ kfree(inst);
+ module_put(THIS_MODULE);
+ inst = NULL;
+ }

write_unlock_bh(&instances_lock);

return inst;
-
-out_unlock:
- write_unlock_bh(&instances_lock);
- module_put(THIS_MODULE);
-out_modunload:
- return NULL;
}

static int __nfulnl_send(struct nfulnl_instance *inst);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/