Re: somebody dropped a (warning) bomb

[Jan Engelhardt]

On Feb 8 2007 11:53, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> 
>Exactly because "char *" doesn't have a defined sign,
>The user has clearly stated "I don't care about the sign". If a compiler 
>complains about us passing "unsigned char *" (or, if "char" is naturally 
>unsigned on that platform, "signed char *") to strcmp then that compiler 
>IS BROKEN. Because "strcmp()" takes "char *", which simply DOES NOT HAVE a 
>uniquely defined sign. 

Thank you for this insight, I don't usually read standards, only RFCs :)
Uh, does that also apply to the longer types, int, long etc.? I hope not.

>only a TOTALLY INCOMPETENT compiler will warn about its signedness.
>That's why we can't have -Wpointer-sign on by default. The gcc warning is 
>simply *crap*.
>[...]
>It really is that simple. gcc is broken. The C language isn't, it's purely 
>a broken compiler issue.

Maybe you could send in a patch to gcc that fixes the issue?


Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/