Re: search-a-little-harder-for-mkimage.patch

[Mike Frysinger]

On 2/8/07, Oleg Verych <olecom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 12:56:17AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On 2/8/07, Oleg Verych <olecom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >> Check to see if `${CROSS_COMPILE}mkimage` exists and if not, fall back to
> > >> the standard `mkimage`
> > >
> > >Why this can't be done by
> > >
> > >  PATH=$CROSS_COMPILE:$PATH
> > >
> > >in your environment?
> >
> > because it wouldnt matter ?  the tool is called
> > "$CROSS_COMPILE-mkimage", it isnt $CROSS_COMPILE_PATH/mkimage
>
> Well, i mean search for your `mkimage'.
>
> Let's see how all this used in Makefiles (avr32, ppc, sh are same)
>
> ../arch/arm/boot/Makefile:
>
>    MKIMAGE         := $(srctree)/scripts/mkuboot.sh
>    ...
>    quiet_cmd_uimage = UIMAGE  $@
>          cmd_uimage = $(CONFIG_SHELL) $(MKIMAGE) -A arm -O linux -T kernel \
>                    -C none -a $(ZRELADDR) -e $(ZRELADDR) \
>                    -n 'Linux-$(KERNELRELEASE)' -d $< $@
>
> type, which with bash or whatever, doesn't matter. All they need *your*
> toolchain in $PATH, why not just to put "$CROSS_COMPILE-mkimage" instead
> of $(CONFIG_SHELL) $(MKIMAGE) here? mkuboot.sh just searches $PATH for
> mkimage and run it. Double overkill, no?

by this argument, why does mkuboot.sh exist at all then ?  let's
simply delete mkuboot.sh and change all arch Makefile's like so:
-    $(CONFIG_SHELL) $(MKIMAGE) ...
+    -mkimage ...

i of course prefer the existing solution: call the mkuboot.sh script
which checks for a few variations of the `mkimage` binary and if it
does not exist, output a friendly message
-mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/