Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled find_trylock_page() removal

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 03:53:07PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >This patch contains the scheduled find_trylock_page() removal.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I guess I don't have a problem with this going into -mm and making its way
> upstream sometime after the next release.
> 
> I would normally say it is OK to stay for another year because it is so
> unintrusive, but I don't like the fact it doesn't give one an explicit ref
> on the page -- it could be misused slightly more easily than find_lock_page
> or find_get_page.
> 
> Anyone object? Otherwise:

Just kill it.  There's absolutely no point in keeping dead code around.
It's bad enough we keep such things around for half a year.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/