[PATCH] Documentation: Explain a second alternative for multi-linemacros.

From: Robert P. J. Day
Date: Sun Dec 31 2006 - 14:38:54 EST



Add an explanation for defining multi-line macros using the ({ })
notation to CodingStyle.

Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---

diff --git a/Documentation/CodingStyle b/Documentation/CodingStyle
index 9069189..1d0ddb8 100644
--- a/Documentation/CodingStyle
+++ b/Documentation/CodingStyle
@@ -549,13 +549,24 @@ may be named in lower case.

Generally, inline functions are preferable to macros resembling functions.

-Macros with multiple statements should be enclosed in a do - while block:
+There are two techniques for defining macros that contain multiple
+statements.

-#define macrofun(a, b, c) \
- do { \
+ (a) Enclose those statements in a do - while block:
+
+ #define macrofun(a, b, c) \
+ do { \
+ if (a == 5) \
+ do_this(b, c); \
+ } while (0)
+
+ (b) Use the gcc extension that a compound statement enclosed in
+ parentheses represents an expression:
+
+ #define macrofun(a, b, c) ({ \
if (a == 5) \
do_this(b, c); \
- } while (0)
+ })

Things to avoid when using macros:

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/