Re: [PATCH 3/3] WorkStruct: Use direct assignment rather than cmpxchg()

[Russell King]

On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 08:06:39PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > and we can assume (and ensure) that a failing test_and_set_bit() will not
> > write to the affected word at all.
> 
> You may not assume that; and indeed that is not so in the generic
> spinlock-based bitops or ARM pre-v6 or PA-RISC or sparc32 or ...

Incorrect.  pre-v6 ARM bitops for test_and_xxx_bit() all do:

	save and disable irqs
	load value
	test bit
	if not in desired state, alter bit and write it back
	restore irqs

but I don't guarantee that we'll always do that - indeed, post-armv6
bitops always write back even if the bit was in the desired state.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/