Re: [PATCH] Export current_is_keventd() for libphy

From: Andy Fleming
Date: Thu Dec 07 2006 - 14:00:57 EST



On Dec 7, 2006, at 11:05, Jeff Garzik wrote:

Yes, I merged the code, but looking deeper at phy its clear I missed some things.

Looking into libphy's workqueue stuff, it has the following sequence:

disable interrupts
schedule_work()

... time passes ...
... workqueue routine is called ...

enable interrupts
handle interrupt

I really have to question if a workqueue was the best choice of direction for such a sequence. You don't want to put off handling an interrupt, with interrupts disabled, for a potentially unbounded amount of time.

Maybe the best course of action is to mark it with CONFIG_BROKEN until it gets fixed.


Yes, this is one of the design choices I made to be able to lock properly around MDIO transactions.

1) MDIO transactions take a long time
2) Some interfaces provide an interrupt to indicate the transaction has completed.

So I didn't want an irq-disabling spin lock. It would prevent 2 from ever being used, and would mean all interrupts were disabled for thousands of cycles for MDIO transactions.

So I decreed that no MDIO transactions can happen in interrupt context. But the registers to disable the specific PHY's interrupt are only accessible through MDIO, so in order to be able to follow that edict AND ever handle the interrupt, I need to disable the interrupt. But I only disable the PHY's interrupt (which is likely shared among some devices). I agree it's ugly, but I haven't yet figured out another way to do it.

I'd love to eliminate the work queue altogether. I keep thinking that I could do something with semaphores, or spin_trylocks, but I'm not sure about the best way to let the interrupt handlers do their thing.

Andy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/