Re: [PATCH] WorkStruct: Implement generic UP cmpxchg() where an archdoesn't support it

From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Wed Dec 06 2006 - 14:58:02 EST




On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Your problem will be, of course, that any architecture that does this in
> hardware will just DoTheRightThing, and as such, broken architectures with
> bad locking primitives will have to test and do source-level analysis
> more.

(The underlying thread here being that the workqueue stuff _should_ be
safe in this regard. But the "testing will not catch bugs like these is
certainly true in general)

Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/