Re: [PATCH] WorkStruct: Implement generic UP cmpxchg() where an archdoesn't support it

[Christoph Lameter]

On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Matthew Wilcox wrote:

> It's just been pointed out to me that the parisc one isn't safe.
> 
> <dhowells> imagine variable X is set to 3
> <dhowells> CPU A issues cmpxchg(&X, 3, 5)
> <dhowells> you'd expect that to change X to 5
> <dhowells> but what if CPU B assigns 6 to X between cmpxchg reading X
> and it setting X?

The same could happen with a regular cmpxchg. Cmpxchg changes it to 5 and 
then other cpu performs a store before the next instruction.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/