Re: [PATCH] WorkStruct: Implement generic UP cmpxchg() where an arch doesn't support it

[Russell King]

On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 10:56:14AM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> I'd really appreciate a cmpxchg that is generically available for 
> all arches. It will allow lockless implementation for various performance 
> criticial portions of the kernel.

Let's recap on cmpxchg.

For CPUs with no atomic operation other than SWP, it is not lockless.
For CPUs with load locked + store conditional, it is expensive.

I've shown in the past that a generic implementation based around ll/sc
can be cheaply implemented using cmpxchg.  The reverse is *not* true.

If you want an operation for performance critical portions of the
kernel, please allow architecture maintainers the freedom to use their
best performance enhancements.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/