Re: [PATCH] Export current_is_keventd() for libphy

[Maciej W. Rozycki]

On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:

> But running flush_scheduled_work() from within dev_close() is a very
> sensible thing to do, and dev_close is called under rtnl_lock().
> davem is -> thattaway ;)

 And when within dev_close() there is quite a chance there is 
linkwatch_event() somewhere in the event queue already. ;-)

> Ah.  The point is that the phy code doesn't want to flush _all_ pending
> callbacks.  It only wants to flush its own one.  And its own one doesn't
> take rtnl_lock().
> 
> IOW, the phy code has no interest in running some random other subsystem's
> callback - it just wants to run its own.  Hence no deadlock.

 Both are true.  It's linkwatch_event() that's somewhere in the queue 
already that makes the trouble here.

> Maybe the lesson here is that flush_scheduled_work() is a bad function.
> It should really be flush_this_work(struct work_struct *w).  That is in
> fact what approximately 100% of the flush_scheduled_work() callers actually
> want to do.

 There may be cases where flush_scheduled_work() is indeed needed, but 
likely outside drivers, and I agree such a specific call would be useful 
and work here.

  Maciej
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/