Re: [PATCH] prune_icache_sb

[Wendy Cheng]

Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 12:49:42 -0500
> Wendy Cheng <wcheng@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  
>
> > I read this as "It is ok to give system admin(s) commands (that this 
> > "drop_pagecache_sb() call" is all about) to drop page cache. It is, 
> > however, not ok to give filesystem developer(s) this very same function 
> > to trim their own page cache if the filesystems choose to do so" ?
> >    
>
> If you're referring to /proc/sys/vm/drop_pagecache then no, that isn't for
> administrators - it's a convenience thing for developers, to get repeatable
> benchmarks.  Attempts to make it a per-numa-node control for admin purposes have
> been rejected.
>  
Just saw you suggested the "next door" LKML thread ("la la la la ... 
swappiness") to use "-o sync" ? Well, now I do see you're determined ... 
anyway, I think I got my stuff working without this kernel patch ... 
still under testing though.

The rename post will be done first thing tomorrow morning.

> > [snip] .......
> >    
> hmm, I suppose that makes sense.
>
> Are there dentries associated with these locks?
>  
Yes, dentries are part of the logic (during lookup time) but 
book-keepings (reference count, reclaim, delete, etc) are all done thru 
inode structures.

>  
>
> > > Did you look at improving that lock-lookup algorithm, btw?  Core kernel has
> > > no problem maintaining millions of cached VFS objects - is there any reason
> > > why your lock lookup cannot be similarly efficient?
> > >
> > >      
Yes, just found the new DLM uses "jhash" call (include/linux/jhash.h). 
I'm on an older version of DLM that uses FNV hash algorithm 
(http://www.isthe.com/chongo/tech/comp/fnv/). Will do some performance 
test runs to compare these two methods.

A final note on this subject - I may not agree with you (about various 
things) but your comments and amazingly quick responses are very very 
appreciated !

-- Wendy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/