RE: [patch 2.6.19-rc6] Stop gcc 4.1.0 optimizing wait_hpet_tick away

[David Schwartz]

> > It comes down to just what those guarantees GCC provides actually are.

> This is the first correct statement in your email.  In any case the
> documented GCC guarantees have always been much stronger than you
> have been trying to persuade us they should be.  I would argue that
> the C standard somewhat indirectly specifies those guarantees but I
> really don't have the heart for any more language-lawyering so I'm
> going to leave it at that.

I have tried to find any documentation of the guarantees gcc actually
provides and have been unable to do so. Where are these "documented GCC
guarantees" documented?

DS


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/