Re: [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes revised

[Holden Karau]

Whoops, sorry about that. Yes it would improve performance on fat12 &
fat16 [although I haven't tested it with fat12]. What I meant by that
sentance is that, fat sync performance is pretty bad with or without
my patch, its just slightly less worse with my patch :-)

On 10/31/06, OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "Holden Karau" <holden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > This patch is just meant to make fat32 sync performance better, not
> > necessarily make it usable for everyone [one step at a time and all
> > that].
>
> Sorry, I can't see your point. The FAT12 and FAT16 also have backup FAT.
> And the your patch didn't make performance better, right?
> --
> OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


--
Cell: 613-276-1645
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/