Re: [PATCH 2/7] severing fs.h, radix-tree.h -> sched.h

From: Roland Dreier
Date: Mon Oct 30 2006 - 11:48:03 EST


Trivial comment:

> /*
> + * Superblock locking. We really ought to get rid of these two.
> + */
> +void lock_super(struct super_block * sb)
> +{
> + get_fs_excl();
> + mutex_lock(&sb->s_lock);
> +}
> +
> +void unlock_super(struct super_block * sb)
> +{
> + put_fs_excl();
> + mutex_unlock(&sb->s_lock);
> +}
> +
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(lock_super);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(unlock_super);

isn't the current fashion to do this like:

void lock_super(struct super_block * sb)
{
get_fs_excl();
mutex_lock(&sb->s_lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(lock_super);

void unlock_super(struct super_block * sb)
{
put_fs_excl();
mutex_unlock(&sb->s_lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(unlock_super);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/