Re: [PATCH ??] Re: incorrect taint of ndiswrapper

[Randy Dunlap]

Alan Cox wrote:
> Ar Gwe, 2006-10-27 am 18:56 -0400, ysgrifennodd Florin Malita:
> > Also, since driverloader is not GPL-compatible (MODULE_LICENSE("see
> > LICENSE file; Copyright (c)2003-2004 Linuxant inc.")), that check is
> > redundant. How about removing it (applies on top of Randy's patch)?
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Florin Malita <fmalita@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> NAK
>
> Older versions of Linuxant's driverloader claim GPL\0some other text and
> systematically set out to abuse the license tag code. We should continue
> to carry the code for this.
>
> Alan

I'm confused.  Do you mean that we should continue to treate driverloader
as GPL?  Oh, I guess I see.  You mean that we should continue to have
special code to override their "GPL\0other text" license.  OK.

--
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/