Re: [PATCH ??] Re: incorrect taint of ndiswrapper

[Florin Malita]

Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> (it's a separate question if ndiswrapper should be in this table;
> driverloader should be, it's non-GPL at all, so that part of your patch
> is broken)
>   

If driverloader is not GPLed then why does it need to be treated
exceptionally to begin with? It taints the kernel anyway because of its
license.

---
fm

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/