Re: [ltp] Re: [PATCH v2] Re: Battery class driver.

[FeRD]

Shem Multinymous wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/25/06, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > If you can summarise the bits I've missed in the meantime that would be
> > wonderfully useful
>
> OK. Looking at the current git snapshot:
[...]
> Why the reversed order, for example, in design_charge vs. charge_last?
> Following hwmon style, I think it should be
> s/design_charge/charge_design/
> s/manufacture_date/date_manufactured/
> s/first_use/date_first_used/
> s/design_voltage/voltage_design/
>
> s/charge_last/charge_last_full/ seems less ambiguous.
>
> s/^charge$/charge_left/ follows SBS and seems better.
Can I propose a further

s/left/remaining/

...flung at the above? Best to avoid "left" as anything but the opposite 
of "right", if disambiguation is the goal.

-FeRD

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/