[Q] missing unused dentry in prune_dcache()?

[Vasily Averin]

Hello folks,

I would like to ask you clarify me one question in the the following patch:
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/gnupatch@449b144ecSF1rYskg3q-SeR2vf88zg
# ChangeSet
#   2006/06/22 15:05:57-07:00 neilb@xxxxxxx
#   [PATCH] Fix dcache race during umount

#   If prune_dcache finds a dentry that it cannot free, it leaves it where it
#   is (at the tail of the list) and exits, on the assumption that some other
#   thread will be removing that dentry soon.

However as far as I see this comment is not correct: when we cannot take
s_umount rw_semaphore (for example because it was taken in do_remount) this
dentry is already extracted from dentry_unused list and we do not add it into
the list again. Therefore dentry will not be found by prune_dcache() and
shrink_dcache_sb() and will leave in memory very long time until the partition
will be unmounted.

Am I probably err?

The patch adds this dentry into tail of the dentry_unused list.

Signed-off-by:	Vasily Averin <vvs@xxxxx>

--- linux-2.6.19-rc3/fs/dcache.c.prdch	2006-10-25 16:09:19.000000000 +0400
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc3/fs/dcache.c	2006-10-25 16:08:20.000000000 +0400
@@ -477,6 +477,8 @@ static void prune_dcache(int count, stru
 			}
 			up_read(s_umount);
 		}
+ 		list_add_tail(&dentry->d_lru, &dentry_unused);
+		dentry_stat.nr_unused++;
 		spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
 		/* Cannot remove the first dentry, and it isn't appropriate
 		 * to move it to the head of the list, so give up, and try
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/