Re: Removing MAX_ARG_PAGES (request for comments/assistance)

[Ollie Wild]

> I'll have another look tomorrow, but I too don't have access to a funny
> platform, so I can be of limited help implementing the missing stack
> model. - that was all that is missing, right?
>
> Peter

That's the main technical item.  I guess I was hoping for some more
general feedback regarding the desirability of this patch: "Yes, this
is good.  Polish it off and we'll incorporate it," "No, we think the
status quo is fine," or something along those lines.

There is one point I forgot to mention.  I'm not sure what to do with
the audit_bprm() function.  It tries to copy the entire argument array
into a kmalloc'ed region, which isn't gonig to fly if we allow the
argument list to grow arbitrarily large.

Ollie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/