Re: [patch] honour MNT_NOEXEC for access()

[Ulrich Drepper]

Stas Sergeev wrote:
> Now, as the access(X_OK) is fixed, would it be
> feasible for ld.so to start using it?

Just must be kidding.  No access control can be reliably implemented at
userlevel.  There is no point starting something as stupid as this.

-- 
â Ulrich Drepper â Red Hat, Inc. â 444 Castro St â Mountain View, CA â

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature