Re: [PATCH 5/5] fdtable: Extensive fs/file.c cleanups.

[Andrew Morton]

On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 14:38:07 -0700
Vadim Lobanov <vlobanov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Friday 06 October 2006 13:22, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:52:28 -0700
> >
> > Vadim Lobanov <vlobanov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > As long as the previous patch replaces the guts of fs/file.c, it makes
> > > sense to tidy up all the code within. This work includes:
> > > 	code simplification via refactoring,
> > > 	elimination of unnecessary code paths,
> > > 	extensive commenting throughout the entire file, and
> > > 	other minor cleanups and consistency tweaks.
> > > This patch does not contain any functional modifications.
> > >
> > > This is the last patch in the series. All the code should now be sparkly
> > > clean.
> >
> > This (wordwrapped) patch should have been the first in the series, not the
> > last.
> 
> Didn't know. Was hoping to gather this kind of feedback after the first 
> submission attempt.
> 
> > So I'll drop this one.
> 
> This patch still has a lot of useful (and I'd argue necessary) fixes for 
> incorrect comments and confusing code ordering. It's especially nice for 
> those who might try to understand what's going on inside fs/file.c, so seems 
> a shame to drop it. I could...
> 	... hold on to it until the other fdtable changes hit mainline.
> 		or
> 	... redo this one with just the bare essentials.
> 		or
> 	... drop it completely.

                or
        ... redo the patches so this one comes first.

Which sounds like a hassle.  If it's too much hassle, your option 1 sounds
OK.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/